Full Name		Full Name is required
Email ID		Email ID required Invalid Email is ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City		City required
Mobile No		Mobile No is required Invalid Mobile No
	* Mobile No is required for verification of identity

Head Note

Indian Penal Code,1860  - Section 302 , Section 34

Murder - Delayed FIR - Eye witness - Testimony of - Distance between the place where deceased was assaulted and the first hospital where he was taken, was about 11 KM. - There he was given medical attention and then referred to Military Hospital, Jalandhar - Considering these facts, the lodging of the FIR in the present case cannot be called to have been delayed unnecessarily - Reporting was without any delay or deliberation and sets out true account of the incident - Assertions in the reporting are well supported and corroborated by the post-mortem conducted the next day - The injuries so found in the post-mortem are possible by the weapons recovered pursuant to the disclosure statements of the accused - Eyewitness account on record is cogent, consistent and trustworthy - Defence version not sustainable - Out of three blows suffered by the deceased only one was attributed to Appellant No.1 while the other two were dealt by Appellant No.2 -Conviction upheld.

Topic(s)-Murder - Delay in FIR - Conviction