Motor Accident Claim
Mode of Citation- ILC-2015-SC-MAC-....
Get started with Indian Law Cases
Your password will be generated automatically and will be sent to your email-id provided in this form.
Full Name
Email ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City
Mobile No
* Mobile No is required for verification of identity
 Bare Acts  | Legal Resources  | Lawyer Locater  | Articles  | Legal Dictionary  | Download Ticker  | Subscription  | Latest Judgement   Home   |   E-Journal  |  Sign-In  | Contact Us  | Disclaimers

Motor Accident Claim
 Search Tips
Motor Accident Claim
Mode of Citation- ILC-2015-SC-MAC-....
Judgement Subject Index/Important Decision/Topic

ILC-2012-SC-MAC-Mar-1

Surender Kumar Arora Vs. Manoj Bisla

Head Note

Motor Vehicles Act,1988  - Section 163-A , Section 166

Distinction between - Admittedly, the petition filed by the claimants was under Section 166 of the Act and not under Section 163-A of the Act. This is not in dispute. Therefore, it was the entire responsibility of the parents of the deceased to have established that respondent no.1 drew the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner which resulted in the fatal accident. Maybe, in order to help respondent no.1, the claimants had not taken up that plea before the Tribunal. Therefore, High Court was justified in sustaining the judgment and order passed by the Tribunal. The claimants had filed the petition under Section 163-A of the Act.

Topic(s)-







                                                                          Full Judgement Body is not available


@2014 Indian Law

Our Ventures
Name
Email ID
Please Wait..