Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2016-SC-CIVIL-....
Get started with Indian Law Cases
Your password will be generated automatically and will be sent to your email-id provided in this form.
Full Name
Email ID
(this email-id will be treated as your User ID also)
Address
City
Mobile No
* Mobile No is required for verification of identity
 Bare Acts  | Legal Resources  | Lawyer Locater  | Articles  | Legal Dictionary  | Download Desktop Software  | Subscription   Home   |   E-Journal  |  Sign-In  | Contact Us  | Disclaimers

Civil Law
 Search Tips
Civil Law
Mode of Citation- ILC-2016-SC-CIVIL-....
Judgement Subject Index/Important Decision/Topic

ILC-2014-SC-CIVIL-Apr-19

Tarsem Lal & Ors. Vs. Ram Sarup & Ors.

Head Note

Civil Law  - Suit for permanent injunction

Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972 - Section 36 and 104 (3) - Suit for permanent injunction restraining them from removing the pump set or interfering, in any manner, with the right of the plaintiff to irrigate his land - Lower court decreed the suit - Appeal was dismissed - In second appeal high court reversed the judgment of lower court - Apex court held that High court wrongly interpreted the sec.36 - As per sec.36 the tenant is entitled to draw water and as per sec. 104(3) a tenant is conferred with all rights of ownership - But the High court held that the section is applicable to tenancy land and not to the ownership land owned by a person, wrongly - Apex court set aside the order of High court and restore the orders of lower court.

Topic(s)-Suit for Permanent Injunction

Important Decision(s)- As per sec. 36 the tenant is entitled to draw water and as per sec. 104(3) a tenant is conferred with all rights of ownership.







Full Judgement Body


     
@2015 Indian Law
Name
Email ID
Please Wait..