ILC-2012-SC-CRL-Jul-5
Anand Mohan Vs. State of Bihar
Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 302 , Section 109
Evidence pertaining to the commission of offence involving large number of offenders and large number of victims, it is usual to adopt a test that the conviction could be sustained only it is supported by two or three or more witnesses who give a consistent account of the incident - Held - In this case, ten out of the fourteen witnesses who were accompanying the procession and were near the place of occurrence have given a consistent version that A-1 exhorted Bhutkun Shukla to shoot at the deceased - Many witness have consistently deposed that A-1 exhorted Bhutkun Shukla to shoot at the deceased - The remaining four witnesses may be at the place of occurrence but for some reason or the other may not have heard the exhortation by A-1 to Bhutkan to shoot at the deceased - Hence, just because four of the fourteen witnesses have not deposed regarding the fact of exhortation by A-1, we cannot hold that the ten witnesses have falsely deposed that A-1 had exhorted Bhutkun to shoot at the deceased.
Topic(s)-
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Apr-3
A.T. Prakashan Vs. Excise Inspector & Anr.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Apr-2
Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Kerala
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Apr-1
Babubhai Bhimabhai Bokhiria & Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-21
Navneet Kaur Vs. State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-20
State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Rajmangal Ram
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-19
B. Jayaraj Vs. State of A.P.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-18
In Re: Indian Woman says gang-raped on orders of Village Court published in Business & Financial News dated 23.01.2024
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-17
Sanghian Pandian Rajkumar Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-16
Vijay Dhanuka Etc. Vs. Najima Mamtaj Etc.
ILC-2014-SC-CRL-Mar-15
Homi Rajvansh Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors.